Moving on to juicing oranges, the Big Mouth failed to impress. It produced about 15mL less juice than the average with little pulp and approximately a half-inch of foam on top. It did a little better at juicing apples, but not by much. We finished with an essentially average yield of juice, but there was tons of pulp in the drink. The juice also rapidly separated, and there was a lot of foam on the surface.
The mixture produced by this juicer was delicious but had a slightly overpowering beet flavor. There was a decent amount of pulp, and the texture was somewhat watery, but the quality was still above average. The Big Mouth centrifugal juicer finished near the middle of the best juicer pack. It does a better job at juicing hard and soft produce than many and retails for less than half of other centrifugal models. This juicer is also slightly easier to clean and handles leafy greens more than adequately.
It produced juice with great texture, but the taste seemed slightly off compared to the other tested models. Our testers found it to be substantially less tasty than the beverages produced by some of the other, higher-quality juicers. Thanks to hamilton beach coffee grinder its straightforward design, shoppers say it’s the perfect place to start as a beginner. Assembling the appliance is as easy as inserting its strainer and locking the lid with latches, and it has a straightforward on and off dial to operate it.
This is the part that grinds the food product you insert into the juicer to produce juice. When you are finished using juicer you want to remove strainer and clean the filter. Some users of these juicers will keep two of these on hand, to be able to change food product and not have to clean the first one immediately. This strainer is made out of metal and it is sold individually.
As a centrifugal juicer, it uses an 800-watt motor to quickly easily extract the juice from even the toughest of produce, like beets. It comes with an extra-large pulp bin to collect waste, plus each part is easy to disassemble and throw right in the dishwasher for easy cleanup. The Big Mouth started this metric with a solid performance at juicing cucumbers, tying for one of the higher scores. It generated an above-average juice yield, exceeding the average by about 15mL, and produced only mild amounts of foam, though there were moderate amounts of pulp.
I thought the two machines were similar in performance, which surprised me since there was a significant price difference. When comparing, using similar amounts of produce going through both machines, they produced the same amount of juice. If the Breville produced better (by teaspoons, maybe), it was not enough to justify spending the extra money based on this alone. The pulp from Breville was a tad bit dryer, didn’t stick to my fingers as much, which suggests more juice having been extracted from it. For our first recipe — a concoction consisting of beetroots, carrots, apples, celery, cucumbers, and ginger root — the Big Mouth delivered a middle-of-the-road performance.
The larger size mouth also allows for whole apples and larger fruits and vegetables so I didn’t have to cut everything into small pieces. For our final metric, we judged the difficulty in cleaning each juicer. We looked at each component, noting any problems we found in cleaning them, whether or not they are dishwasher-safe, and include a cleaning brush.
This metric focused on the actual yield when juicing various types of softer food and the quality of the juice generated. We used cucumbers, celery, apples, and oranges to judge performance. Of these two juicers, Hamilton Beach seemed like the better choice for us. Cost, size, clean-up, handling of the machine, hamilton beach coffee grinder and the fact that they were so similar in performance, were factors that led us to choose Hamilton Beach over Breville. The extra $100 for the Breville machine versus Hamilton Beach was not worth it in our opinion. I don’t see how it could be worth it for anyone, unless looks is the most important part.